Regular marked price: $26.99Discount Price: $19.99
Cost Savings: $7.00 (26%)Price fluctuation possible.
How soon does it ship: Normal ship time within one day
Shipping? Absolutely FREE if you qualify for Super Saver Shipping.
Aspect Ratio: 2.20:1
Audience Rated by buyers PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Type of bind: DVD
Brand: Warner Brothers
EAN num: 0053939268324
Format: AC-3, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Original recording remastered, Special Edition, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
Label: Warner Home Video
Manufacturer: Warner Home Video
Quantity: 2
Publishing house: Warner Home Video
Region Code: 1
Release Date: August 14, 2007
Running Time: 242 minutes
Sale Popularity Level: 673
Studio: Warner Home Video
Theatrical Release Date: December 25, 1996
Other books you might be interested in perusing:
Editor's Notes and Comments:
Product Description:
Studio: Castle Rock Hm Video Release Date: 08/14/2007 Run time: 242 minutes
Amazon.com:
It's the greatest work of literature, but nobody had ever filmed Hamlet uncut--until Kenneth Branagh went about the task for his lavish 1996 production. The result is a sumptuous, star-studded version that scores a palpable hit on its avowed goal: to make the text as clear and urgent as possible. Branagh himself plays the melancholy son of the Danish court, caught in a famous muddle about whether to seek revenge against his royal father's presumed slayer… the man who now sits on the throne and shares the bed of Hamlet's mother. (Or, as the song 'That's Entertainment' summarizes the plot: 'A ghost and a prince meet / And everyone winds up mincemeat.') As a director, Branagh (who shot the movie in 70 mm.) uses the vast, cold interiors of a vaguely 19th-century manor to gorgeous effect; the story might scurry down this hallway, into that back chamber, or sprawl out into the enormous main room. With its endless collection of mirrors, the place is as big and empty as Citizen Kane's Xanadu.
That all works; what doesn't work is Branagh's tendency to over-direct the big dramatic moments. He indulges in quick cutting and flashbacks as though to fend off the audience's objections to the four-hour running time, and the style sometimes looks like wasted energy. The experienced Shakespearians in the cast come off nicely; Derek Jacobi's Claudius, Richard Briers' Polonius, and Michael Maloney's Laertes are just terrific. Julie Christie is a suitably attractive Gertrude, and Kate Winslet makes the most of Ophelia's mad scenes. Branagh's habit of folding in unexpected American performers is on the mark, too: Billy Crystal is surprisingly good as the Gravedigger, Robin Williams predictably camps up Osric, and Charlton Heston is an inspired choice as the grandiloquent Player King. The biggest irony here is that Branagh himself is not quite spot-on as Hamlet. Of course he speaks the lines beautifully, but Branagh's screen personality radiates certainty and clarity of vision; there's little of the doubt that might make him Hamlet-esque. Still, tremendous credit for fending off slings and arrows to get the movie made. --Robert Horton
User popularity level:
Rated by buyers 
-
Hamlet is not normally a movie I would even consider looking at, I just bought it to look at for a school project.
Rated by buyers 
-
I was overwhelmed by this production of Hamlet. Kenneth Branagh is wonderful and plays the part of Hamlet with such sensitivity and vitality - makes the unabridged lines accessible, even to people unused to Shakespeare. Kate Winslet is excellent. The whole cast and the scenes - especially the scenes - are staggeringly good. The only Hamlet on film, worth watching! Kenneth Branagh is a genius.
Rated by buyers 
-
Branagh's Hamlet
Watching Kenneth Branagh's massive film of the complete text of Hamlet for about the fourth time, I realized that this film mirrors the talents and career of its talented actor/director. Ever since his highly successful film of Henry V, which ably competes with the classic version of Olivier, it seems that Branagh has been trying to film another great Shakespeare movie, but has not quite been able to repeat his early triumph. His long Hamlet has not been able to change that pattern. His use of certain unsuitable actors, his lack of real passion, and his inability to always keep things moving have made this a merely enjoyable movie rather than a great one.
I don't say that American actors can't do Shakespeare. There have been some great American actors, such as Orson Wells, who have done magnificent Shakespeare films, such as Wells' Othello, but most American can't do the great Englishman very well (or at least not as well as Wells). However, Kenneth Branagh seems to agree with Al Pachino, whose Looking for Richard starts off intending to show that Americans can do the Bard as well as any. Unfortunately, Pachino falls far short of proving his claim, and Branagh has used American actors with varying degrees of sucess in his Shakespeare films since Henry V, but it is in his Hamlet that his Anglo-American spirit of production shows its biggest failure, since the stakes here are the highest. I'm sure the main reason that American film actors are used here along with British stage and film actors is to broaden the appeal, but it doesn't always work.
The use of the wonderful American film actor Jack Lemmon is a good place to start, since he has some of the very first words in the movie. It's not that he doesn't know what he's saying, which seems to be the case with many American film stars who try Shakespeare, but he just can't keep up with the flow of the language to make it sound natural. His British colleagues simply run rings around him, the poor old fellow, and this is part of the problem--he's just too old for this part of a soldier on watch outside at night in the cold. Any one of the Brits could have successfully taken the part, and it's not a very minor one; in the role of Marcellus, he enters with Horatio and presents Horatio's skeptical nature, while speaking to the other two soldiers who have also both seen the ghost, "this dreaded sight twice seen of us." Even though Lemmon tries manfully, he can't summon the same passion as Ian McElhinney as Barnardo. But, this is perhaps no great matter. Much worse is the presence of Gerard Depardieu as the spy Reynaldo. He completely misses the humour in his part--in fact, he misses nearly everything in his part, and so does the audience, wondering what he's doing there. He's there for the same reason as all the "name" stars are here: because they are draws, while Shakespeare is not, at least for the large targeted American audience. I don't know if Branagh had these stars thrust upon him, but he must take responsibility as director.
Some of the Americans do work well, such as a surprisingly good Robin Williams as Osric, and Billy Crystal as the grave digger, though Mork is the better of the two. Charlton Heston is also good as the Player King, though he's a bit too leaden.
Some of the best acting is done by Derek Jacobi, as King Claudius, and Richard Briers as Polonius; no old fool, he plays the part of Claudius's spymaster with reserve and cunning. Kate Winslet as Ophelia also comes in for special praise for her mad passion over the murder of her father by her lover. She also shows control, and doesn't tear it to tatters, either. Hers is real madness, and comes close to being frightening. Also good are Michael Maloney as Ophelia's brother Laertes, who plays with a fine ferocity, and Rufus Sewell as Fortinbras, Hamlet's foil, who plays with a subdued fire, waiting for his chance.
And how is Branagh's Hamlet? Good, but not great. Cool and reserved, a rational Dane, not a Romantic. Perhaps he's closer to Horatio's materialism than we thought? But, he does say there are more things than science (Aristotle's "Natural Philosophy") in heaven and earth. My favorite Hamlets are Olivier, Jacobi , and Burton. They all have more depth and sheer excitement than Branagh can bring to the part, though there are ingenious touches in Branagh's direction, such as his use of the mirrors in "To be, or not."
Perhaps the biggest problem with this movie is its sheer length. Since it attempts to present the complete play with no cuts, it runs the risk of bogging down in the fens, especially by the middle of the fourth act, when young Fortinbras goes through Denmark towards Poland over "an eggshell." Since this is a movie, and not a film of a ... Read More
Rated by buyers -
Before I go into the visual and interpretive masterpiece that is Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet, let me begin by asserting my firm belief that Shakespeare was meant to be experienced, not merely poured over. While the language is obviously crucial to understanding the play as a whole, simply watching the emotional interactions and contemplations of this play can be just as powerful. If you don't have the opportunity to see a live performance of Hamlet (which would be the real tragedy) Branagh's adaptation is probably the subsequent best way to experience Shakespeare's masterpiece. The majesty of the Edwardian set blends perfectly with the mysterious plot and shrouded characters and the visuals add life that viewers would expect of any performance.
Branaugh's adaptation, the full text of the original play, is consistent with basic interpretations of the plays but plays down the idea of Hamlet as truly crazy. While Branagh certainly performs as a madman would, we clearly see it is little more than that, a performance-- something left to the interpretation of those who only read the text. While the play may be a little melodramatic at times (namely during all the soliloquies) and the final confrontation is overly dramatized (since when was a chandelier involved?), Branagh's Hamlet is definitely the best filmed adaptation of Shakespeare's memorable tragedy.
Viewers will enjoy this film even if they haven't read the play and it is certainly coupled well with the text for those who have!
Rated by buyers 
-
Yes, this is one of Kenneth Branagh's productions of Shakespeare; and he typically saves the most interresting role for himself. He is a good actor, but in my opinion, the multi-emotional role of Hamlet is beyond his ability. When Hamlet is instructing the actors he hires for the play within the play, he begins to act, but then stops himself in deference to the troupe of real actors, headed by none other than Charlton Heston. Branagh should have taken a cue from Hamlet.
Find other books like this one:
