Regular marked price: $17.00Discount Price: $11.56
Cost Savings: $5.44 (32%)Price fluctuation possible.
How soon does it ship: Normal ship time within one day
Shipping? Absolutely FREE if you qualify for Super Saver Shipping.
Type of bind: Paperback
Dewey Decimal Number: 935.050924
EAN num: 9780140440072
ISBN number: 0140440070
Label: Penguin Classics
Manufacturer: Penguin Classics
Quantity: 1
Page Count: 384
Printing Date: June 30, 1950
Publishing house: Penguin Classics
Sale Popularity Level: 178678
Studio: Penguin Classics
Other books you might be interested in perusing:
User popularity level:
Rated by buyers 
-
Rex Warner's is a pretty sleepy translation, albeit an important, early effort (from 1950). Compare the following passage (on the very first page) from Warner...
"But, after the death of Darius, when Artaxerxes was established on the throne, Tissaphernes maligned Cyrus to his brother and accused him of plotting against him. Artaxerxes believed the story and arrested Cyrus with the intention of putting him to death: but his mother by her entreaties secured his life and his recall to his province. Still, after the danger and disgrace from which he had escaped, Cyrus took measures to ensure that he should never again be in his brother's power; instead, if he could manage it, he would become king in his brother's place."
... with WHD Rouse's translation (1959). Rouse drives home the point much faster:
"But when Dareios died and Artaxerxes succeeded, Tissaphernes slandered Cyros to his brother and said he was plotting against him. The king believed him, and siezed Cyros to put him to death, but his mother begged him off and sent him back to his province. When Cyros got clear of this danger and disgrace, he determined never again to be in his brother's power, but to make himself king instead, if he could."
Now if only Stanley Lombardo would put the Anabasis on his to-do list. He had an incredible touch with the Iliad.
Rated by buyers 
-
I bought the book because I had to read it for one of my classes. But I was pleasantly surprised. Xenophon provides an interesting Greek perspective on the Persian Empire. And while the writing is a bit boring to read in places, overall it is a page turner. (if you enjoy reading history that is)
I would recommend this for anyone interested in the ancient world. But be warned, it is a translation of ancient writing, so it reads accordingly.
Rated by buyers -
I went into this with great anticipation. I'm a huge fan of Steven Pressfield's military historical fiction, and thought that Xenophon was likely an influence on Pressfield's writing. The results held up well, although with a minor drawback.
The story stumbles a little in the beginning through the march into Persia. There are maybe one or two too many asides too early on. but soon Xenophon finds his narrative footing and the books relentless battles and skirmishes begin to grip the reader. This initial pace is my only real qualm, and it is minor. On to the good!
One way in which the book excels is in it's portrayal of an army travelling through exotic locales and cultures (from a Greek's point of view as it would seem at the time). I had heard ahead of time that Xenophon had the politically incorrect perspective of a 'civilized' man who was touring 'barbarian' lands. While there is certainly some of that slant, I found it not nearly as prejudiced as noted. Xenophon seems, for his time, to be fairly open to foreign ideas, and judges men on their conduct and honor, not what country they happen to be from.
While the battles are done well enough, what makes this book timeless and an essential look into the philisophy of the ancient world is it's portrayal of what it means to keep your honor and dignity, and never compromise your values no matter how dire your situation looks. This is where Xenophon as his own protagonist in the story works so effectively (a somewhat unconventional style; third person of his own life). He is a man of straight moral bearings, which is essential to liking what is, basically, a group of marauders who don't hesitate to enslave women and children if they can sell them at market for some bushels of barley.
Xenophon, through council of his fellow warriors, as well as his diplomatic skills with foreign powers, displays what is fundamentally the supreme virtues Greek Philosophy idealized. Being an Athenian, who spent a lot of time with Spartans, Xenophon displays the words and action representing the best of both cities, as well as additional ethics he picks up on from other leaders such as Noble Prince Cyrus.
That is not to say that Xenophon is historically representing himself as he always acted, but this is mostly irrelevant. What has echoed through in his writing from antiquity is that THIS is what he believed every leader should aspire to behave as, both to honor his peers, and to also do honor to himself and his house. And it is just as true today. Live by a moral code in all you do, and everything else is up to the Fates.
As a final note, to anyone reading the edition with the George Cawkell introduction, I advise that you skip it until after reading the story. Cawkell seems to me, a man of backhanded compliments to Xenophon. In fact most of his intro consists of borderline character assassinations on Xeno. Some of it may be true about his inaccuracies in geography and a few events to which we have other historians' versions, but a note to take it with a grain of salt is sufficient, not a full-on devalue of the work as a whole. He has many interesting things to say about the times it portrays, but I think he forgets that his job is ONLY to do this, not sneak in his own criticisms to people before they even get to the very first page of the book to form their own impressions objectively.
Rated by buyers -
This was an entertaining glimpse into the capabilities of a Greek mercenary army. The army starts by fighting its way through enemy territory (Persia) to get back home. Once they do arrive home, the army is perceived as a threat by their own people due to the fact that they are a large, well trained and very experienced standing army with no employer. So Xenophon tells the tale of this Army and its ups and downs as they try and find their niche in the ancient world.
If you are like me and AGI (Ancient Greece Ingnorant), I recommend reading through the introduction quickly or not at all before you start the book. Turn back to it and read it more in depth as you proceed through the book. I was unfamiliar with the goings-on of ancient Greece before I started the book so much of the subject matter in the introduction confused me. When I read the introduction again after I completed the book I understood it much better.
**I do not have a lot of knowledge on the subjest of ancient Greece nor have I read extensively any literature prior to this pertaining to the time period other than The Illiad and The Oddysey. My grammer sucks too**
Rated by buyers 
-
Xenophon accompanied the Ten Thousand, a large army of Greek mercenaries hired by Cyrus the Younger, who intended to seize the throne of Persia from his brother, Artaxerxes II. Though Cyrus' army was victorious at Cunaxa in Babylon (401 BCE), Cyrus himself was killed in the battle, rendering the victory irrelevant and the expedition a failure. Stranded deep in enemy territory, the Spartan general Clearchus and most of the other Greek generals were subsequently killed or captured by treachery on the part of the Persian satrap (or warlord) Tissaphernes. Xenophon played an instrumental role in encouraging the Greek army of 10,000 to march north to the Black Sea. Now abandoned in the middle of the hostile Anatolian plateau, without communications and supplies other than what they could obtain by force as they went, the 10,000 had to fight their way northward, making ad hoc decisions as to their destiny. Ultimately this "marching republic" managed to reach the shores of the Black Sea, which meant home for most of the soldiers.
I sometimes find reading ancient literature somewhat difficult, but Xenophon (as translated by Rex Warner) was fairly straight forward and easy to understand. The political infighting doesn't seem to have changed much in 2400 years, and I think that a few executions for disciplines' sake may not be out of order now-a-days. It is also a grand adventure and very interesting travelogue of Ancient Near East, with descriptions of some of the tribes from the former Hittite empire. A definite classic that those with an interest needs to read.
Find other books like this one:
