Regular marked price: $14.00Discount Price: $11.20
Cost Savings: $2.80 (20%)Price fluctuation possible.
How soon does it ship: Normal ship time within one day
Shipping? Absolutely FREE if you qualify for Super Saver Shipping.
Type of bind: Paperback
Dewey Decimal Number: 942.021
EAN num: 9780140058505
ISBN number: 0140058508
Label: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Manufacturer: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Quantity: 1
Page Count: 208
Printing Date: August 27, 1981
Publishing house: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Sale Popularity Level: 75191
Studio: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Other books you might be interested in perusing:
User popularity level:
Rated by buyers 
-
Ther are alot of new books out about Hastings,particularly ones that cover the Viking invasions of 1066 and the Godwin family.Howarth seems to sink into an idyllic Anglo-Saxon past (which probably never existed)in his work. There are alot of descriptions of rural domesticity particularly in the very first part of the book which seemed too pastoral for my liking.(Time for someone or something to shake them up there)!The price for losing contact, even to a lesser degree as the Anglo-Saxons did,with the European continent---A Norman invasion complete with a professional army with some Vikings in the north picking up some table scraps.This tale doesn't say much for Harald's Fyrd(the middle age equivalent of today's militia).So much for Anglo-Saxon fantasyland.Read Bloodfeud and you'll get a more true picture of what Anglo-Saxon was like.Mongrels are usually much smarter dogs anyway.
Anyway Howarth's thesis seems to be that William's attack on the Anglo-Saxons was the result of papal machinations in Europe.The pope had granted William an,"I'm in the right and Harold's wrong" stamp in the summer of 1066.As a result William knew he had to act quickly before the Saxon rulers had a chance to send a delegation to Europe to dispute the pope's decision. Harold indeed was duly elected by the Saxon government of England but William also had a claim due to inheritance rights.With the pope's cyclical against Harold,Harold was diminished in the hearts and minds of the common folk as well as a few of Harold's Saxon and norman enemies.If it's any consolation,anglo-norman England repays Normandy in 1337 with the start of the hundred years wars.
Rated by buyers 
-
Very readable history. Shows how naive we Americans are because we have been so poorly taught real history.
Rated by buyers -
Like sitting on a star, looking down on the continental world, we get a broad, quick, and enjoyable view of this critical year. Yes, as some reviewers say, it is biased by the author. But what history is not? "History is what men have decided upon," Napoleon said. My view is that what makes a people is geography and religion, and in the end it is geography. "1066" certainly reinforces that concept. What if the wind had blown from the East -- for just one day in the summer, that history would have been written in French perhaps. For those wanting scholarly treatises with lots of footnotes, there are plenty of other big thick books. Howarth has made a valuable historical contribution to the rest of us. A great and welcome read.
Frederick R. Andresen, Author of "Walking on Ice, An American Businessman in Russia."
Rated by buyers -
David Howarth's 1066 is really an essay. There are no end notes, nor learned rabbit trails to follow. Instead, it is a well-written, informative, and at times, personal re-telling of one of Britain's more compelling stories. He deftly reviews the players, sets the stage, and in just a few pages poignantly relates Harold's defeat. All in all, he is kind to Harold and the Godwins but we, English readers, tend to lean in that direction. All the politics and intrigue lie with William and his allies and we only see part of that. However, for what it is, it is excellent.
Rated by buyers 
-
The book is amusing and provides a good overview of the Norman Conquest for people that look for a very first approach to the subject. Do not expect a scholarly book, but it has good information, while maintaining good rythm to keep the reader interested. However, it has a serious flaw for any history book that wishes to be seriously considered. The author is more concerned in giving his point of view that in objectively describing facts and events and drawing conclusions from them. Beforehand Harold and the English are the good and almost flawless characters in the story, while the Normans are assigned a villanous role in their responsibility for putting an end to an almost paradisiac pre-Conquest England. The problem is not that the author has a view (we all have one), but that instead of drawing it as a conclusion to the facts he brings to light, he accomodates facts to suit his pre-conception.
Find other books like this one:
